Solar Cells – Small but
Powerful
A solar system consists of a number of interconnected
solar modules, and a module comprises many solar cells. The cell is therefore
at the heart of the photovoltaic system. Photovoltaic processes take place
within the system that convert the energy radiated by the sunlight into
electrical energy. Solar cells mostly consist of an inorganic semiconductor
material, generally silicon. Cells may consist of other semiconductor
materials, for example gallium arsenide, cadmium telluride, copper-indium
diselenide or even organic hydrocarbon compounds. Silicon solar cells are,
however, the most common type in use.
Monocrystalline or
polycrystalline
Silicon solar cells can differ in their crystal
structure. In monocrystalline solar cells, the silicon is in the form of a
single crystal with a uniform crystal lattice structure. This homogeneous form
of the crystal permits them to generate more energy from sunlight than crystals
with a non-uniform crystal structure. Monocrystalline silicon is, however,
relatively expensive to manufacture, and more energy has to be expended in the
fabrication of these solar cells. This in turn affects the ‘energy return
time’.
The polycrystalline variant is different. Here, the
silicon consists of numerous small individual crystals. The solar cells are
cheaper to manufacture and the energy return time is considerably shorter.
Because of this, polycrystalline cells offer a good price/performance ratio,
although their efficiency is somewhat less than the monocrystalline variety.
Crystalline or thin film
The semiconductor material used is another factor that
differentiates types of solar cells. Both monocrystalline and polycrystalline
cells belong to the category of the silicon-based solar cell. An alternative is
the so-called thin film process, in which a very thin coating of amorphous
silicon (a-Si) is applied to a glass plate as plasma. This saves both material
and energy. A further advantage of the thin film module is that it generally
converts even weak and diffuse light into electricity better than its
crystalline counterpart does. Moreover, the current output remains constant on
hot summer days, whereas for crystalline modules the output decreases as the
temperature increases. Thin film modules can also be tailored to meet
individual requirements in size, design and power output. This is why they are
often employed in larger architectural projects, the solar cells being
frequently integrated directly into the shell of the building.
Because thin film modules are less efficient than
crystalline modules at the current state of the art, thin film modules need a
larger surface area to give the same energy yield. This involves, at least
partially, higher system costs, for example, for module attachment. For this
reason, a successor process based on micromorphous technology is already in
development that is expected to increase the energy yield per unit of surface
area.
According to estimates made by the State Bank of
Baden-Wuerttemberg (Germany) and other market observers, the market for thin
film modules will continue to grow in coming years, but in the long run, the
modules will not displace the crystalline technology. It is more likely that
both production processes will coexist and complement each other in specific
application areas in order to meet the individual desires and requirements of
users1).
Source: 1) LBBW Sector Report,
8/2007.